Following Rangers’ shocking Scottish Cup defeat to Queen’s Park—a lower-division team—Stewart questioned Clement’s tactical choices and overall approach. This loss marked the first time since the 1966–67 season that Rangers have been eliminated from the Scottish Cup by lower-league opposition.
In his analysis, Stewart highlighted the team’s lack of cohesion and urgency during the match, pointing out that despite having nearly 30 attempts on goal, Rangers failed to score. He emphasized that such a performance is unacceptable for a club of Rangers’ stature and raised concerns about the manager’s ability to motivate and organize the squad effectively.
Stewart also addressed the apparent disconnect between Clement and the Rangers supporters. Following the defeat, videos surfaced showing Clement receiving verbal abuse from fans outside Ibrox Stadium. While acknowledging the supporters’ frustration, Stewart suggested that Clement’s post-match comments, which downplayed the severity of the loss, might have further alienated the fanbase. Clement stated that he didn’t perceive a crisis and believed he still had the board’s backing, remarks that Stewart found perplexing given the circumstances.
Furthermore, Stewart questioned the club’s decision to retain Clement despite mounting pressure. Reports indicate that financial constraints, including a potential £1.2 million compensation fee for terminating Clement’s contract, have influenced the board’s reluctance to make a managerial change. Stewart argued that while financial prudence is essential, the club’s on-field performance and relationship with its supporters should take precedence.
In summary, Michael Stewart’s critique centers on Philippe Clement’s recent decisions and the broader implications for Rangers Football Club. He underscores the urgency for introspection and decisive action to realign the club’s direction and restore its esteemed standing in Scottish football.
Be the first to comment