Currie, who was covering the William Hill Cup semi-final, didn’t hold back in his post-match analysis, suggesting that key officiating calls went unfairly against Rangers and directly influenced the outcome of the Old Firm clash.
Speaking after the match, Currie said:
“It’s hard to look at that game and not feel that Rangers were let down by the officials. Some of the calls were baffling — in moments that really mattered.”
His remarks have divided opinion among fans and pundits alike. While some Rangers supporters praised him for “telling the truth” about what they perceived as poor refereeing, others accused Currie of stoking unnecessary tension in an already heated rivalry.
Former referees and media personalities were quick to respond, with one pundit calling Currie’s comments “reckless” and warning that broadcasters should avoid questioning refereeing integrity without concrete evidence.
The match itself was marred by controversy, with Rangers players visibly frustrated over a disallowed goal and a disputed penalty call that went in Celtic’s favour. Manager Danny Rohl refused to publicly criticise the officials but admitted the decisions “changed the rhythm” of the game.
Currie has since stood by his analysis, clarifying that his comments were “about consistency and accountability” rather than bias. However, the fallout continues, with some viewers calling for the broadcaster to issue an on-air clarification.
With emotions still running high after another dramatic Old Firm encounter, the debate over officiating standards in Scottish football shows no sign of slowing down — and Darrell Currie now finds himself at the centre of it.
Be the first to comment