These options aim to address the competitive balance, financial sustainability, and overall appeal of the league.
One proposed option is to increase the size of the Premiership, expanding the number of teams competing at the top level. This could provide more opportunities for clubs outside the traditional top six, such as Aberdeen and Hibernian, to challenge for European spots, while also distributing TV revenue more evenly across a larger number of teams. The larger league would also create more competitive matchups and increase fan engagement.
Conversely, another option is to decrease the size of the Premiership. By reducing the number of teams, the league would likely see more concentrated talent and a higher standard of football at the top. However, this approach could create fewer opportunities for clubs in the lower leagues to rise through the ranks, potentially narrowing the scope for clubs to progress and thrive.
A third option would be to maintain the current size but revise the lower leagues. This could involve changes in the structure of promotion and relegation, creating a more dynamic and exciting system for teams outside the Premiership. A new playoff system could add more drama to the relegation and promotion battle.
The final option involves implementing an expanded split format. After the first phase of the season, the league could split into two groups—one for the top teams and another for those battling relegation. This would ensure that teams continue to play meaningful matches throughout the season, regardless of their position.
Each of these proposals has its pros and cons, but all aim to improve the quality and financial sustainability of Scottish football while ensuring a more competitive league.
Be the first to comment